service · no. 10Security · disciplineSenior engineers ready · 04·20·2026

Security Audits & Code Analysis.

Independent security inspection of your codebase, dependencies, and infra — with concrete fix patches, not just a PDF. We read the code the way an attacker would, prove every finding, and hand you the fixes as pull requests.

sastdastscacode reviewhardening
01Deliverables

What shows up in your repo.

01

Agent graph

Typed nodes, tool schemas, retry and fallback policy. Versioned like code.

agents/*.ts · dag.yaml
02

Eval harness

Golden sets, LLM-as-judge, regression runs on every PR.

evals/*.jsonl · ci.yml
03

Observability

Traces, token costs, hallucination rates, drift alarms. Wired to your stack.

otel · datadog · honeycomb
04

Runbook

What to do when a tool 500s, when latency spikes, when eval red-lines.

docs/runbook.md
02What we inspect

Source code, dependencies, and the infra around them.

A real audit reads the code the way an attacker would, then proves each finding. We cover the whole surface — not just whatever a single scanner flags.

Secure code review (SAST)

Manual review by senior engineers backed by static analysis — auth, injection, access control, secrets, unsafe deserialization, and the business-logic flaws scanners miss.

Dependencies & supply chain (SCA)

Known-CVE detection across your lockfiles, transitive-dependency risk, and a prioritized upgrade path that will not break your build.

Runtime & DAST

Exercised against a running environment: authn/authz boundaries, IDOR, SSRF, injection, and misconfigured headers — each reproduced with evidence.

Cloud & infra config

IAM, network exposure, secrets management, and CI/CD pipeline hardening across AWS / GCP / Azure.

03Findings come as fixes

A pull request, not a PDF.

bash~/logic-layer · security audit
$ll audit --scope=repo,deps,infra  ✓ 4 critical · 9 high · 22 medium — each with a repro  ▸ opened 31 hardening PRs against your branch$ll verify --retest  ✓ criticals fixed and re-tested · evidence attached
04How we report

Severity-ranked, evidence-attached, re-tested.

critical findings
fixed in PR
turnaround
10 working days
re-test
included
deliverable
PRs + report
05Proof — one we shipped

A pricing engine, rebuilt in six weeks.

One representative case. Read the full editorial walkthrough, including the deploy log and latency chart.

06Questions engineering leaders actually ask

Six things finance + eng teams want answered.

What is the difference between a secure code review and a security audit?

A secure code review reads the source for vulnerabilities; our security audit is broader — it adds dependency/supply-chain analysis (SCA), runtime testing (DAST), and infrastructure review. You can scope us to just the code review or the full audit.

Do I get a report or actual fixes?

Both. Every critical and high finding comes as a hardening pull request against your branch, with a written repro and an explanation — not just a PDF you have to translate into engineering work.

What is the turnaround?

A typical source code security audit lands in about 10 working days, depending on codebase size. Criticals are surfaced as they are found, not held to the end.

Do you re-test after we apply fixes?

Yes. Re-test of the critical and high findings is included, with evidence attached, so you can show an auditor or customer that the issues are genuinely closed.

Which languages and stacks do you cover?

TypeScript/Node, Go, Python, and the common web frameworks, plus AWS / GCP / Azure infrastructure and CI/CD pipelines. If your stack is unusual, we will tell you up front whether we are the right fit.

How is this different from running a scanner ourselves?

Scanners produce noise and miss business-logic and access-control flaws. Senior engineers triage, prove, and fix — you get a short list of real, exploitable issues with patches, not a 400-line report to wade through.

end · next step

Send us one workflow.We'll send back a plan in 48 hours.